now Sen. Utter feels that since we have an Auditor we don't need a Treasurer this could not be farther from the truth. Sen. Utter says it will save money. I don't believe so the people who work in the current treasurers office will just be moved to the Auditor's office. The Treasurer is the check writer for the state that is a giant responsibility. The office of Auditor is huge also and has a lot of responsibilities including making sure the states money is being spent the right way. Are the offices similar yes however they are not the same. Doubling the duties of the state auditor does not make the government more efficient it makes it less. This is about making sure the states checkbook is thoroughly watched. The Treasurer writes the checks and manages the state budget. The Auditor monitors where the money is going and how efficiently the states money is being used both are tremendous jobs. No one person should hold responsibility for both. The potential for impropriety is too great, especially when one person controls both ends of the checkbook. No, Sen. Utter's bill should be defeated, for the good of the state.
I for one would like to see more statewide offices like Commissioner of AG or `State Insurance Commissioner they would provide more transparency in government which is a good thing.